WARNING: If you are not Catholic, you can probably skip this post. It will seem bizarre and confusing to you. :)
...OK, maybe I have time for one little rant today. LOL!
Recently I was kicked off a Catholic mother's list I had participated in for years because I dared to disagree with CCLI - I feel that their claims of 99% accuracy with correct use of their methods are not..um...right. [To date, I have found NO clinical trial of any sort that backs up this anecdotal claim...anyone got one to share with me?]. I also disagreed with the WAY they promote NFP - as "Catholic birth control", not as something to be used according to Church teaching - only for serious and grave reasons. My disagreement with CCL's statistics and methods was equated with *disagreeing with Church teaching* on this email list [by the list owner] and I was kicked off. Wow.
I've been kicked out of a Catholic Bible study before for being "too Catholic" [and daring to defend Confession as necessary and artificial contraception as wrong....] but nobody, ever, anywhere, has ever accused me of disagreeing with Church teaching.
I was amazed.
Then, this week, our Archdiocesan Newspaper ran a two page spread on NFP. The article they ran frankly made my stomach turn.
A little background here, my husband and I taught Pre-Cana classes for the Archdiocese for 7 years, and we were both frustrated that we were basically only *allowed* to teach NFP as "catholic birth control" and we were not allowed to mention things like being open to life and the fact that the Church teaches that using NFP is only OK when there are "serious and grave reasons" to avoid a pregnancy.... we couldn't even really talk about Children always being a gift from God. While we *adored* the women who ran the program, we felt frustrated because the fullness of Church teaching was not being covered...
In addition, my husband and I also went through the teacher training for CCLI to become NFP instructors for our Archdiocese - and finally quit working on our "certification" in disgust at the "closed to life" attitude we encountered with CCLI, among other problems with the organization. So, I DO know that of which I speak....
Here is the article that ran this week:
"With NFP, Couples Discover Deeper Partnership"Boy, did this article bother me. I can't decide if I should send in a letter or not, because of our personal connection with this Archdiocesan ministry - I would not like to hurt the feelings of the women who run this program.
BUT...
I am really irritated right now.
In this article, they interviewed 3 different couples who teach NFP around the Archdiocese. They made a *big* deal about how 2 of the 3 couples only had 2 children - and one couple has 4 but they made a HUGE deal of the fact that they were all "planned". One of the couples was actually quoted as saying "We used NFP to postpone childbearing when we were first married. We wanted to travel, get financially secure, and just spend time enjoying each other before we had children" - and then it says "They have been married for 9 years and have 2 children".
Also there were comments like "While 'some couples are called' to have a large family, she said, it is not a correct assumption about couples using NFP".
NO WHERE in this entire article - huge 2 page spread - did it even *mention* Church teaching on being open to life. Or the fact that NFP should only be used for "serious or grave" reasons. NO WHERE. Nor did it mention what a blessing children are, or what a gift.
Oh, but they did go on and on about how it was 99% effective. [**cough cough**]
In addition, one of the teaching husbands is quoted as saying "'Like everything else in life, you have to have self-discipline,' he said. 'Many times we’re not talking about a huge window—just a couple of days.'"
REALLY? What the heck method are they using? Since a woman's body can harbor sperm for up to 5 days before she ovulates and she can STILL conceive from relations 5 days earlier - I don't see how that is remotely possible using *any* method. The most accurate method in the world [using that new ovulation predictor thingy] is still going to require a week or so of abstinence. And that ONLY applies to people with those text book perfect 28 day cycles with extremely clear signs of ovulation. For *most* women who have some variation, the required abstinence is more than a week.... at least that has been my experience with myself and the women I know who have used it.
[Of course, among the women I know personally who have used it, almost all of us have at least one "oops" baby who was conceived while using NFP... so that also makes me doubt the 99% accurate claims].
I'm trying not to totally froth at the mouth about this - I am trying to tell myself that they are trying to reach the contraceptors and that NFP, even used incorrectly, is certainly better than artificial birth control. But I just feel so annoyed about this article. NFP is definitely being taught as "Catholic birth control" with this kind of junk, and Church teaching is being completely lost.
Couples are NOT being called to view children as a gift from God or to be open to God's Will or open to life. Not once in the whole spread do they mention *praying* or *discerning* God's will regarding another child - it is just presented as something the couple does when THEY see it as convenient for whatever stupid reason [they are done traveling for the time being I guess... ugh].
And I won't even get started on the implication in the article that babies who *weren't* planned by their parents are somehow lesser or unwelcome, or the implication that if you use NFP correctly you won't *have* any unplanned babies... Some of God's greatest gifts are things WE don't plan for.
How about an article about couples who actually *trust God* and actually follow Church teaching and leave their fertility totally in God's hands [if they have no grave reasons to avoid pregnancy]? After all, God is a whole lot smarter than we are ... and He DOES provide.... why can't we provide some role models like that in our Paper?!!
Anyway, I am so sorry for the vent... but gosh. This just drives me nuts.
[Re-reading this, I realize I need to temper this - I DO understand that God and the Church are not calling us to churn out endless babies one after another regardless of anyone's health or ability to care for them, like some cosmic puppy mill. There are *many* reasons that are "serious" reasons to avoid another pregnancy, and those reasons are perfectly licit and good reasons to avoid another baby. So, please don't misunderstand me there. But true Church teaching on this matter was not covered at all in this article IMO....]